By A K Ramanujan
Read or Download A generative grammar of Kannada PDF
Best grammar books
This choice of papers opens a debate at the dating among strategies of grammaticalisation and platforms of word-classes. It facilities at the query of the way diachronic grammaticalization approaches and synchronic hierarchies of grammaticality relate to the lexico-grammatical categorization of the note stock in ordinary languages (= platforms of word-classes).
The difficulty of permanence and alter of word-patterns has lengthy been debated in either old linguistics and structural theories. The curiosity during this subject has been remodeled through modern learn in typology with its emphasis on correlation or "harmonies" of buildings of be aware order as explicative rules of either synchronic and diachronic approaches.
This publication investigates intimately the grammar of polysynthetic languages--those with very advanced verbal morphology. Baker argues that polysynthesis is greater than an unintended selection of morphological approaches; really, it's a systematic approach of representing predicate-argument relationships that's parallel to yet special from the method utilized in languages like English.
- A Grammar Of Organizing
- The Philosophy of Grammar
- The Pragmatics of Word Order: Typological Dimensions of Verb Initial Languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology)
- Objects and Information Structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics)
Additional info for A generative grammar of Kannada
Affixation is based on linear adjacency in that the resulting linearization is <(θ−α), δ, π> and not <θ, (δ−α), π>. It is the single leftmost element in the string which can serve as the host for the affixal predicate. I label this constraint in Nuu-chah-nulth the string adjacency effect. (31) String adjacency effect: An affixal predicate must be linearized as a suffix to the leftmost element in the string which is linearly adjacent to it. Which property of the grammar is responsible for this adjacency requirement?
Under the view that derivational opacity associated with DP and CP domains is tied to saturation, Nuu-chah-nulth presents evidence for variation in the permeability of these domains – specifically, against the universality of “escape hatches” for long-range processes. Turning to cross-linguistic variation in affixation, this chapter discusses affixation mechanisms other than local spell-out. First, affixation arising from local spell-out is contrasted with the more complex process of syntactic head movement.
IMP Let us put something sweet in our mouths. In (34), there are two affixal predicates: /u-Pal “taste of” and /u-Cuq “in mouth”. IMP). Recall that syntactic derivations are built from bottom to top. We assume the first step of the syntactic derivation to be one in which the predicate -Pal “taste of” joins with jamas “sweet” via Merge (Pal , jamas). ) (35) 3 -Pal jamas taste sweet Because –Pal is a suffix, this arrangement must be linearized at spell-out as