By J McLaren
Read Online or Download A grammar of the Kaffir language PDF
Best grammar books
This choice of papers opens a debate at the courting among methods of grammaticalisation and platforms of word-classes. It facilities at the query of ways diachronic grammaticalization procedures and synchronic hierarchies of grammaticality relate to the lexico-grammatical categorization of the notice stock in average languages (= structures of word-classes).
The difficulty of permanence and alter of word-patterns has lengthy been debated in either ancient linguistics and structural theories. The curiosity during this subject matter has been made over by way of modern learn in typology with its emphasis on correlation or "harmonies" of constructions of observe order as explicative rules of either synchronic and diachronic approaches.
This ebook investigates intimately the grammar of polysynthetic languages--those with very advanced verbal morphology. Baker argues that polysynthesis is greater than an unintended selection of morphological procedures; really, it's a systematic means of representing predicate-argument relationships that's parallel to yet designated from the procedure utilized in languages like English.
- English Grammar Demystified: A Self Teaching Guide
- Nueva Gramática de la lengua española
- The Language Wars: A History of Proper English
- Approaches to Syntax
Extra resources for A grammar of the Kaffir language
In contrast, with the Récit-operator only Declarative-Assertive clause operators can occur. Notice that in Récit texts there is no room for derived illocution operators: in this type of texts so-called implicature phenomena can hardly occur. ) which may be found only in Discours texts. "RÉCIT" AND "DISCOURS" AS DISCOURSE OPERATORS 35 As regards the proposition layer, I have argued elsewhere (Moutaouakil 1993) that this layer is more likely relevant for Discours texts than for Récit texts. The main argument is this: in discourse the propositions express a (possi ble) fact which can be judged as true or false, believed or disbelieved, hoped or wished, known or thought, because of this they presuppose a (real) speaker who expresses these different attitudes toward the fact involved.
Ii) A: John is a good linguist. B: No, John is not a good linguist. He is a good philosopher. References Barthes, Roland. 1976. S/Z. Paris: Point. Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Seuil. Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1985. " In Bolkestein et al. (eds), 1-14. Bolkestein, A. Machtelt, Casper de Groot and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds). 1985. Syntax and pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. , Roel M. Vismans, Christopher S. Butler and Richard A. Gatward (eds).
Discourse and pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Cuvalay, Martine. 1995. The Ε-structure in Functional Grammar: towards a constitu ent treatment of tense, mood, aspect and illocutionary force. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 59. Dik, Simon 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: the structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris. "RÉCIT" AND "DISCOURS" AS DISCOURSE OPERATORS 41 Fortescue, Michael, Peter Harder and Lars Kristoffersen, (eds). 1992. Layered struc ture and reference in a functional perspective.